Gay Marriage: Sexual Freedom Trumps Religious Freedom

In Same-Sex Marriage on December 2, 2008 at 3:25 pm

ufilogoOver the past couple of months I have engaged in the gay marriage debate several times with a handful of people. I have drawn the same conclusion every time, this is not a debate about gay rights, this is a debate about religious freedom.

As the marriages of gays and lesbians are legalized around the world, those who are free to practice religion lose aspects of that precious freedom.  Sexual freedom trumps religious freedom, this is a pattern that has happened and will continue to happen as long as states and countries ignore that marriage is between a man and a woman.

A perfect illustration of my argument took place in March of 2006 in the liberal state of Massachusetts.  Catholic Charities of Boston began in 1903 as an adoption agency primarily serving Catholic children left by parents who died or abandoned them.  For more than 100 years this respectful organization placed children in homes with goodly parents who would watch over and nurture them as they grew.  Catholic Charities was the most successful private adoption agency in the state, handling more adoptions than any other.  They were a beacon of hope to displaced children, a group of individuals who worked unselfishly for the advancement of the helpless.

In 2006 Catholic Charities of Boston was forced to shut down their adoption department and get out of the business of finding homes for children.  This decision was made after the organization was given an ultimatum from the state government: Comply with state law and adopt to gay couples, or close your doors.  The Catholic church condemns homosexuality, it is a practise that is against the Catholic religion, for this they morally could not place a child in to the home of a gay or lesbian couple.  The governor at the time, Mitt Romney, attempted to pass legislation that would have allowed religious organizations an exemption from the adopting to gays law, but was shut down by his state legislature.  Thus, rather than defy their religious beliefs, Catholic Charities of Boston voluntarily stopped their adoptive services.

I could go on with more examples.  

My religion is very dear to me, and my religious freedom is one that I take very seriously.  That may not mean anything to the State of Massachusetts or the Supreme Court of California, but to me it means everything.  What will happen in the day that my church is sued and crippled because gay marriages are against our beliefs?  How will religious organizations cope with laws that equalize sexual orientation with race?

We must protect traditional marriage and define it as a union between man and woman.  We must ensure that nothing ever trumps religious freedom.

  1. I agree and it seems that the battle evolves now into morality over everything else. Keep posting!

  2. […] just read this blog post Gay Marriage: Sexual Freedom Trumps Religious Freedom and while I agree with some of it I disagree with other aspects. Take time to read this and […]

  3. […] First, our State Supreme Court ignored our voice and by May of 2008 overstepped their governing limits and created a new law – homosexual marriage. […]

  4. […] Gay Marriage: Sexual Freedom Trumps Religious Freedom […]

  5. […] Gay Marriage: Sexual Freedom Trumps Religious Freedom […]

  6. […] Blog Posts Gary Bauer: Obama CavesGay Marriage: Sexual Freedom Trumps Religious FreedomUS President-Elect Plans to Revoke All Anti-Abortion LawsCanada Proves That Same-Sex Marriage Paves […]

  7. […] Gay Marriage: Sexual Freedom Trumps Religious Freedom […]

  8. […] an associate due to religious beliefs and the Boy Scouts in Berkeley, Calif. for excluding gay men. A Boston Catholic adoption service was forced to close rather than be required to adopt to gay couples and the Christian dating site […]

  9. […] Gay Marriage: Sexual Freedom Trumps Religious Freedom […]

  10. Very true, it is all about removing religious freedom

  11. Has the author ever been in a homosexual relationship before? Maybe if he or she has they would understand that its not about the sex or sexual rights, it’s about love and commiting yourself to another person and working together as a unit. If your church does not want to perform the ceremony then they shouldn’t be forced to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 170 other followers

%d bloggers like this: