Greg Barlow
”Epigenetics” is the name given to a theory that presumes that the life experiences of our ancestors are actually implanted into our DNA. Early psychoanalytical theory sought to find ways to deprogram this ‘genetic heritage’ assuming that an abundance of emotional and psychological characteristics emanated from this genetic ancestral baggage.
I’m not qualified to offer an opinion on the details or validity of this theory but it does provide an interesting opportunity to reflect upon how our lives might leave an imprint upon our posterity, not just for immediate generations but for undetermined numbers of generations well into the future.
BYU TV offers a very interesting series called ‘The Generations Project’. Each episode features a person who is seeking to gain context to their lives by researching the life experiences of their ancestors. It is fascinating and instructive to watch the process of discovery and the power of meaningful connections that are made with ancestors of earlier generations.
My eldest granddaughter bears her grandmother’s maiden name as her given name. Interestingly, even though a young girl, she feels a special obligation to carry her name in a manner that would please her great grandfather whom she has never met him. She is also always interested in learning more about his life. Is her interest and sense of obligation genetic or is it just curiosity? I don’t know, but clearly there is a connection that bridges the restriction of mortality and it helps form her understanding of who she is.
The idea of ancestral experiences having a impact upon our lives seems a universe removed from our current culture in which 40 percent of all children are born out of wedlock with little, if any, prospect of connecting with a father – let alone distant forbearers.
In the headlong rush to redefine marriage and family in ways that accommodate the here and now of sexual and lifestyle preferences, it may do us well to be mindful of the value of the past and future of family bonds and parental influence.
In judging whether experience or genetic influences have the greater effect on behavior, I recall an experiment on ability to see, conducted on kittens. Two litters of kittens were divided equally before their eyes opened. One group was raised in a room with only vertical lines and the other in a room with only horizontal lines. A single chair was placed in the room. The results established that kittens must learn to see because the first group never jumped up onto the seat of the chair, while the second group had no difficulty doing it. However, the second group kept bumping into the legs of the chair, which the first group very seldom did. Conventional wisdom says kittens are born knowing how to see. Not so!
[...] This is a repost from the United Families International site – part of my daily reading schedule. It was written by Greg Barlow. [...]