UFI

Why Marriage Matters

In Same-Sex Marriage on December 15, 2008 at 4:26 pm

ufilogoLast night, during a discussion over the absurd Newsweek cover story, A Religious Case for Gay Marriage, this comment was made, “If gays are legally able to wed, it will not really affect my marriage, nor your marriage.”  I was pretty surprised to hear that comment and I fear that others may believe this lie.  In truth, if same-sex marriage is legalized it will not only have a tremendous impact on my marriage, but on all current and future marriages.  Families would lose important aspects of religious freedom and the freedoms and rights that are given to parents would be under attack if gays and lesbians are legally allowed to marry.     

One argument that I have made before is that as gay marriage is legal the freedom of religion is lost.  As the marriages of gays and lesbians are legalized around the world, those who are free to practice religion lose aspects of that precious freedom.  Sexual freedom trumps religious freedom, this is a pattern that has happened and will continue to happen as long as states and countries ignore that marriage is between a man and a woman.

The various religions that view homosexuality as a sin would, through the legal process, be forced to change their doctrine or face punishment such as the loss of tax-exempt status or other legal ramifications.  Sexual orientation would be viewed in the same light as race or eye color, characteristics that are by no means controllable, a notion that the teachings of many religious institutions fully oppose.

Take these 3 cases for example:

  •  February 24, 2000: A professional printer refused to print material for the Canadian Gay and Lesbian Archives because he felt doing so would violate his religious beliefs. He was fined and ordered to print the material anyway. He took his case to the Ontario Supreme Court and then to the Ontario Court of Appeal and lost both times. His total legal bills exceed $170,000.
  • March 10, 2006: Catholic Charities in Massachusetts is forced out of the adoption business for the first time in 100 years because it will not place children with homosexual couples.
  • January 28, 2008: Jon and Elaine Huguenin, a young Christian couple from Albuquerque, N.M, were tried before the New Mexico Human Rights Commission after they declined a request to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony, citing their religious beliefs. The same-sex couple filed a discrimination complaint with the commission, which scheduled the hearing. In the hearing, the Huguenins cited their First Amendment rights, but the commission sided with the same-sex couple. The Huguenins were fined $6,600.

Marriage matters because of the effect on education and the parent’s right to teach and rear their children in the manner they see fit.  It is widely documented that once same-sex marriage becomes legal, it will be taught that it is just as acceptable as heterosexual marriage in public schools.  The schools that will be forced to teach about homosexual marriage and parents will be unable to withdraw their students from these teaching sessions.  Public schools will, by law, be required to teach about gay marriage.  Students will, by law, be required to listen as teachers teach the mandated material.  Parents will, by law, be required to stand by as principles that they disagree with are taught to their children.  I do not wish to practice “fear-mongering,” the scenarios that I have laid out are real and have already happened in some states.   

As a society grows lax in its defense of the traditional family, the goals of the anti-family movement draw closer to fulfillment.  Their desire is to create a genderless society that is run by the state – void of religion, marriage and parents.  They hope for a pleasure-filled culture with no responsibilities and zero accountability.

Archbishop George Niederauer said in a post-Prop. 8 editorial, “Members of churches who supported Proposition 8 sincerely believe that defining marriage as only between a man and a woman is one such issue. They see marriage and the family as the basic building blocks of human society, existing before government and not created by it. Marriage is for us the ideal relationship between a man and woman, in which, through their unique sexual complementarity, the spouses offer themselves to God as co-creators of new human persons, a father and mother giving them life and enabling them to thrive in the family setting.”

MUST READ: The Gay Marriage Mess in Mass.

  1. I appreciate the information in this message. However, I would like to have more references when phrases like “It is widely documented that once same-sex marriage becomes legal, it will be taught that it is just as acceptable as heterosexual marriage in public schools.” are used. We need to have more real sources that actively support this instead of a generality without specifics. This is real ammunition for discussions such as this which is severely needed. Of course, those who oppose may not really want to hear the supporting examples but there are those who do and we need to be able to help them understand when that opportunity presents itself.

    Thank you,

    Doug

  2. Doug,

    I appreciate your enthusiasm on this topic. I would urge you to explore the links that are in the text of the blog post. As you click on them, they will lead you to references that back up the claim.

    Thank you!

  3. I would also suggest that all read this: MUST READ: The Gay Marriage Mess in Mass.

  4. Blogger970, thank you so much for linking to my article. That is the reason I posted it. I was sent that post in an email right before the election. And since then I too have heard the lie that gay marriage wouldn’t affect “my marriage.” (I am not married but hope to be one day and I don’t intend to be Party A or Party B, but the bride! Waited too long to be anything else!) so I wanted to show exactly how gay marriage has affected the lives of those who have to live with the consequences in Massachusetts. God bless you for linking me on your blog. I will be adding you to my blogroll.

  5. [...] freedoms and rights that are slipping away from us nearly unnoticed.   I read this quote over at United Families. It makes  my parental blood boil, because I have seen enough of social workers, family courts and [...]

  6. [...] Has an Attached ConsequenceTrue Colors of the RainbowNew Pro-Life Video from Live Action FilmsWhy Marriage MattersAbout [...]

  7. [...] message will be that a “genderless society” is what people all over the world deserve. Their message will be that gender is what is holding [...]

  8. [...] live in America and here the people decide their laws. If the people of California want to change the institution of marriage let them so vote in a legal [...]

  9. [...] Massachusetts, based on their state Constitution, to immediately grant full, legal recognition of marriage to same-sex couples. Then, in California, after 4.6 million people sought to define the definition of marriage as the [...]

  10. [...] becomes the fifth state to do so. The other four: Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts and Vermont. It is well documented that the legalization of same-sex marriage puts religious and parental freedoms in danger.  It is [...]